Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan issued a stern warning during a Justice and Development (AK) Party meeting on Wednesday, urging global powers to cease their interventions in Syria. His remarks underscored Turkey’s growing assertiveness in regional politics and its vision for Syria’s future amidst the complex dynamics involving Israel, the U.S., and other international actors.
Erdogan’s Warning to Global Powers
Erdogan’s statement, “All countries should get their hands off Syria,” directly addressed nations involved in military operations and interventions within Syria, particularly the United States, France, and Israel. He emphasized that continued aggression in Syria could result in widespread negative consequences.
Criticism of Israeli Actions in Syria
Erdogan specifically criticized Israel for its operations in Syria, stating, “Israel and all others attacking in Syria must end their aggressive actions at once.” Israel has conducted airstrikes targeting Syrian military assets to prevent their acquisition by Islamist groups. Additionally, it has seized territory on its border with Syria, further complicating the regional dynamics.
Turkey’s Role in Syria
Opposition to Kurdish Forces
A central focus of Erdogan’s policies in Syria has been the destruction of the Kurdish-led People’s Protection Units (YPG), which control parts of northeastern Syria. Turkey classifies the YPG as a terrorist organization due to its links to the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), a militant group seeking Kurdish independence from Turkey since 1984. Erdogan has reiterated his commitment to eradicating these groups, stating, “The only fate awaiting those who choose terror and violence is to be buried in the ground with their weapons.”
Strategic Goals and Concerns
Erdogan envisions replacing Iran and Russia as the dominant influencers in Syria, effectively transforming it into a client state aligned with Turkey’s interests. This shift is viewed cautiously by Israeli officials, who are concerned about the potential rise of a Sunni-Turkish alignment offering safe havens to terrorist groups.
The Fall of Assad and Its Implications
The fall of Bashar al-Assad, facilitated by the Sunni Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), has significantly altered Syria’s political landscape. Turkey reportedly supported HTS in its offensive, further cementing its influence in the region. Israeli officials have outlined two possible outcomes for Syria:
- Leadership under Ahmed Hussein al-Sharaa, leader of HTS.
- A fragmented Syria with autonomous cantons, which aligns with Israel’s preferred vision.
Erdogan’s Stance on Syrian Unity
Erdogan has consistently emphasized Turkey’s opposition to the fragmentation of Syria. At a press conference on January 6, he stated, “We will not consent to the disintegration of Syria or the disruption of its unitary structure under any guise.” He further warned that Turkey would take swift action to preserve Syria’s territorial integrity if necessary.
FAQs
Why does Turkey oppose the YPG in Syria?
Turkey considers the YPG a terrorist organization due to its ties with the PKK, which has waged an armed struggle against Turkey since 1984. Ankara views the YPG’s control over northeastern Syria as a direct threat to its national security.
What is Israel’s stance on Turkey’s actions in Syria?
Israel is wary of Turkey’s growing influence in Syria, particularly its potential to harbor terrorist groups. However, Israeli officials have clarified that they do not seek direct confrontation with Turkey.
How has the fall of Assad impacted Syria’s future?
The fall of Bashar al-Assad has led to a power vacuum, with different factions vying for control. While Turkey supports a unified Syria under its influence, Israel prefers a fragmented state with autonomous regions.
Conclusion
Turkey’s involvement in Syria reflects its broader geopolitical ambitions and its determination to shape the region’s future. Erdogan’s calls for non-interference underscore his desire to position Turkey as a central player in Middle Eastern politics. However, the interplay of various international and regional actors makes the path to stability in Syria complex and uncertain. As the situation evolves, the world will watch closely to see how Turkey navigates the challenges of asserting its influence while managing potential conflicts with global powers.